By Chief Mass Communication Specialist Julianne Metzger,
Chief of Naval Operations Public Affairs
WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan
Greenert assured members of the Senate Armed Services (SASC) Committee March 27
on the survivability of the littoral combat ship (LCS).
Alongside Secretary Ray Mabus the two defended the need for
52 small surface combatants in front of the SASC and in front of media
following their testimony. The secretary emphasized how LCS costs have been
driven down and Greenert responded to questions on LCS survivability.
"Survivability is a broader term than we're giving it
credit for," said Greenert. "There are three elements to
survivability."
The three elements of survivability are: susceptibility, the
ability for a ship to defend itself; vulnerability, the effects of an initial
casualty on a ship; and lastly recoverability, the ability for a ship to
conduct damage control, said the admiral.
Responding to U.S. Sen. Carl Levin and media, Greenert
explained that LCS meets or exceeds the same standards of those elements of
survivability and recoverability. He said the attributes of survivability in
the LCS is comparable to frigates and better than the ships it is designed to
replace such as mine countermeasures (MCM) and patrol craft (PC).
"We can work on the susceptibility, and we do have a
plan in place," said Greenert. "I want better survivability."
The LCS is an important small surface combatant the Navy
needs now and in the future, said Greenert.
Although Greenert supports the overall LCS design, he is
open to modifications that would increase both survivability and flexibility of
the platform.
"This ship has the ability to grow; it has speed, it
has volume and it has capacity," said Greenert.
Despite ongoing LCS criticism, the admiral underlined the
necessity of the LCS to fulfill the Navy's small surface combatant count.
"We need small surface combatants," said Greenert.
"We need 52."
In responding to more questions about the need for a small
surface combatant, Greenert described that the next ship after LCS could look
quite different although maybe the same LCS hull. Greenert compared it to the
evolution of Hornets and destroyers. He pointed out that the Navy is coming up
on a fourth flight Arleigh Burke destroyer which the Navy is very, very,
satisfied with.
Another aspect about LCS that was highlighted in the hearing
is that LCS is a validated requirement that meets the mission it was designed
to do. This point was brought up by Levin. Soon after the hearing the Director
of Surface Warfare, Rear Adm. Thomas Rowden, confirmed this with interested
media.
"There's no doubt we're continually learning more about
how we can best employ the ship as part of the integrated force, but the bottom
line is that it meets the mission it was intended to do," said Rowden.
"We have to remember that the overarching question when looking at
survivability is 'how are we going to operate these ships?' LCS has a validated
set of requirements - and it meets them."
No comments:
Post a Comment