By Amaani Lyle
DoD News, Defense Media Activity
CAMP H.M. SMITH, Hawaii, May 28, 2015 – Nepal’s beleaguered
citizens are struggling to recover from the April 25 magnitude-7.8 earthquake
that claimed more than 8,600 lives, caused countless injuries and left many
thousands missing.
But a United States Agency for International Development
official said broader collaboration continues concurrently with U.S. Pacific
Command on regional priorities including disaster preparedness, nontraditional
regional threats, such as resource insecurity; climate change, pandemic issues
and environmental considerations.
“The steady state environment of Pacom gives us the
opportunity to partner to achieve USAID development objectives, writ large,”
said Natalie Freeman, senior USAID advisor to Pacific Command. “In the
Asia-Pacific, USAID focuses on maternal and child health, food security,
climate change, and inclusive economic growth. We can cooperate across the
entire spectrum of our regional portfolio.”
Focus on Economic Integration
In this vast Asia-Pacific region -- particularly in Pacom’s
area of responsibility, which covers more than 50 percent of the world's
surface area and is home to just shy of 60 percent of the world’s population --
USAID focuses on opportunities, Freeman explained.
“Asia is home to three of the four largest economies in the
world. It is the fastest growing region with a middle class of 1 billion
people. The trade volume is expected to double by 2025. Asia Pacific is
expected to almost double its share of global GDP by 2050. The opportunity for
regional economic integration is quite expansive.” she said.
USAID and Pacom work closely with Association of the
Southeast Asian Nations to focus on economic integration, resources and
security, Freeman said. “We will soon have a maritime awareness workshop,
bringing in delegates from ASEAN [and] experts from our regional mission in
Bangkok to discuss and agree on recommendations that will advance maritime
security and in turn support regional efforts for fisheries management that
will support long term food security and economic livelihoods,” she added.
Impact of Unregulated Fishing
Freeman cited a specific issue in need of attention:
illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing in a certain regions of Pacom’s
jurisdiction. “It’s very important from a security perspective because of the
risks it creates at sea,” she explained. From a development perspective, she
said, overfishing can adversely affect food security and economic growth.
“Fisheries contribute to livelihood and economic
development,” she said. “There is a development interest in resilient economics
and security at sea advancing this goal. This is one area of shared space where
PACOM and USAID can work together.”
Evolution of Relationship With India
In describing broader diplomatic successes, Freeman noted
the evolution of the U.S. relationship with India.
“We are transitioning our relationship with India from that
of a donor-recipient to more of a strategic partner. For example, India is a
strategic partner in Feed the Future, the Presidential Initiative on food
security, given that India has demonstrated the ability to achieve economic
growth through agricultural growth,” she said.
And Pacom, she added, is similarly focused, as evident in
the ongoing Nepal disaster response.
“Building the capacity of regional leaders is something we
both take on together, [and] ideally, countries in the region are better able
to respond to their own needs or crises through having more capability.”
This, in turn, empowers nations to partner with the U.S. to
lead the improvement of the living environment for their citizens rather than
adopt a more reliant recipient role, she said.
Critical Stewardship
Collaboration with Pacom and other agencies also facilitates
critical stewardship in an era of fiscal uncertainty.
“We never have enough resources for the demand,” Freeman
said, “We must be strategic about the resources we have and try to make sure we
get the best impact for the taxpayer’s dollar.”
Despite somewhat disparate authorities and appropriations,
USAID and the military can mutually support efforts by leveraging resources,
comparative advantages and unique capabilities to accomplish our respective
missions, Freeman said.
“It’s important for the Department of Defense to articulate
its rebalance to Asia, but equally important for the entire international
apparatus for the United States, which includes development and diplomacy,” she
added.
Efforts in Burma and Sri Lanka
Since the Asia rebalance began, Freeman said, USAID has
opened a mission in Burma to assist the nation in its economic transition,
political reform, private sector development and human rights issues. USAID,
she added, is also considering support for the newly elected democratic
government of Sri Lanka and has been instrumental in supporting development of
better management of disaster risk reduction.
“There’s a broader message on the U.S. rebalance that
involves defense, diplomacy and development, and it’s important that we
coordinate that message to mutually reinforce our impact,” she said.
Beyond the initial response in Nepal, Freeman acknowledged,
addressing engineering, deconstruction, reconstruction, health, sanitation
issues and overall restorative efforts in Nepal will take time to complete.
Meanwhile, the effort has enhanced civilian-military coordination, planning,
and policy coherence.
“Since USAID’s first civil-military policy in 2008, much
progress has been made. USAID and DOD know each other better now,” she said.
“The Deputy Development Advisor, Garret Harries, and I include Pacom staff in
relevant USAID training courses. We conduct the Development in Vulnerable
Environments (DIVE) training for PACOM leadership and staff, and because we
better understand how to work well together, I think we’re more successful in
civil and military cooperation.”