By Terri Moon Cronk
DoD News, Defense Media Activity
WASHINGTON, March 26, 2015 – Top Navy and Air Force
officials today told the House Armed Services subcommittee on tactical air and
land forces the president’s budget request for fiscal year 2016 will support
modernizing combat aviation programs.
Navy Vice Adm. Paul A. Grosklags, principal military deputy
to the assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and
acquisitions; Air Force Lt. Gen. James M. “Mike” Holmes, deputy chief of staff
for strategic plans and requirements, Air Force headquarters; and Air Force
Maj. Gen. Timothy M. Ray, director, global power programs, office of the
assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition, all testified on the need
for a modern force.
Navy and Marine Corps aviation allows “sea-based and
expeditionary naval forces to bring simultaneous influence over vast stretches
of the maritime environment across the shoreline and deep inland,” Grosklags
said.
Aviation Must Stay Ready, Poised
It is therefore critical that U.S. aviation forces remain
“always ready and poised to engage at a moment’s notice with required capacity
and capability to influence events, and if necessary, to fight and win,” he
said.
As global threats and demands increase, the Navy’s budget
grows more challenging, Grosklags said, adding that the Navy and Marine Corps
depend on today’s modernization and readiness efforts.
“Across the department, the strategies for our development,
procurement and sustainment of [existing] and future weapons systems are
critically dependent upon stable, and predictable funding at a level
commensurate with [the president’s 2016 budget request],” he said.
“The alternative has been made clear by our secretaries and
service chiefs,” the admiral emphasized. “A smaller force, a force less forward
deployed; a force slower to respond in a crisis, is a force, which, when it
does respond, will be less capable and more vulnerable.”
Budget Would Help Balance Air Force Needs
The National Defense Strategy is increasingly at risk,
Holmes said, and the proposed budget takes steps to balance the many challenges
the Air Force faces.
“The Air Force continues every day to deliver global
vigilance,” he said. “However, [after] more than 25 years of sustained combat
operations and years of constrained budgets, it is becoming more difficult to
achieve our mission.”
The first of many difficult capacity decisions before the
Air Force is whether to divest itself of the A-10 fighter jet, he said.
“There’s no question the A-10 has been a steady and stellar
performer in recent conflicts,” Holmes told the panel. “Nevertheless, our force
structure is simply unaffordable in today’s fiscal environment.”
Divesting the entire A-10 fleet would free up $4.7 billion
for the Air Force’s future defense program, which would pay for priority
capacity, capability and readiness needs, he said.
But overall, the Air Force fighter jet fleet is facing an
average age of 30 years, the oldest in the service’s history, Holmes said.
“The fourth-generation F-15s and F-16s, that are the
majority of our fighter fleet, require upgrades to extend their life span and
provide the combat capability required to prevail in today’s increasingly
contested environments,” he emphasized.
Similarly, the advanced capabilities of the fifth-generation
fighters -- F-22s and F-35s -- are critical to ensure the service’s ability to
fight and win in contested environments, he added.
“The Air Force continues to be the world’s finest across the
spectrum of conflict, but the gap is closing,” Holmes noted. “A return to
sequestration-level funding would result in a less-ready, less-capable,
less-viable Air Force that’s unable to fully execute the National Defense
Strategy.”
Sequestration is a provision of current budget law that
mandates major across-the-board spending cuts in fiscal 2016, which begins Oct.
1.
Global Security Complex
Today’s global security environment is more complex than
ever before, Ray told subcommittee members, and the Air Force “must continue to
invest in science and technology to modernize our capabilities.”
The budget proposal continues to focus on modernizing Air
Force capabilities while exploring game-changing technologies for the future,
Ray added.
“Adversaries are developing technologies and capabilities to
shape and deter our nation,” he pointed out.
“[We] must continue to institute servicewide efficiencies
that will capitalize on innovative concepts, keep weapons systems on track and
build affordability into new systems,” Ray said, adding that the president’s FY
16 budget proposal “reflects Air Force priorities in these areas.”