By Nick Simeone
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, June 20, 2014 – “I don’t know of an institution
in the world that has higher personal standards than the military. We want to
keep that,” Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said in March as he announced the
appointment of a Navy admiral to be his senior advisor for military
professionalism following a series of highly publicized incidents that he said
called for reinvigorating “our ethics and character.”
Three months after taking that job, Rear Adm. Margaret “Peg”
Klein has arrived at some tentative conclusions not always easily recognized
within the ranks of the bureaucracy of the world’s largest public employer.
“I have to look at the components of trust and make sure we
are training our people on how important trust is and what goes into trust,”
Klein said today in an interview with American Forces Press Service.
Accountability is at the top of her list, she said.
Klein’s mission is to coordinate with the Joint Staff, the
combatant commands and the military services to determine how each can better
focus on ethics, character and competence at every level.
“Every once in a while, humans make mistakes and so the goal
of my office is to look at the best practices across the services and up our
game,” she said.
Department officials point to several instances of ethical
lapses in particular that led to the creation of her post, including the case
against Army Gen. William “Kip” Ward, the former commander of U.S. Africa
Command who was demoted two years ago after the Pentagon’s inspector general
found he had improperly expensed travel and misused aircraft assigned to his
command.
Earlier this year, the Air Force relieved nine officers,
allowed a commander to retire and disciplined nearly 100 others after airmen in
charge of the nation’s intercontinental ballistic missiles were found to have
cheated on a proficiency exam. That came on the heels of allegations that Navy
personnel at the Charleston Nuclear Power Training Unit in South Carolina had
cheated on a qualification exam.
“I think there were a series of incidents that happened in
fairly quick succession that told the secretary he needed someone to singularly
focus on this,” Klein said. Hagel has said the department needs to determine
whether there is a deeper, wider problem than these instances alone and has
said addressing the matter remains the department’s top priority.
Since becoming the secretary’s senior advisor on ethics,
Klein says she has met with a diverse set of academics and practitioners with
the goal of further developing the professional military and in the process has
discovered a common leitmotif.
“Very important is the culture of accountability,” she said.
“We have to make sure that across the department that that culture is
understood and reinforced at all levels.”
It’s fundamental issues such as these, she said, that go to
the heart of what puts the U.S. military in a class all its own.
“We see trust as a foundation that makes us an effective
fighting force,” Klein said. “I have to look at the components of trust and
make sure we are training our people on how important trust is.”
Some observers have wondered whether a military under stress
from 13 years of continuous war has contributed to some of the ethical issues
affecting the force. “It’s not about the war itself,” Army Gen. Martin E.
Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in March.
“It’s about the pace at which we’ve been operating and the
fact that we’ve neglected some of the safety nets that we’ve traditionally
relied upon to make sure we’re living up to the values of our profession,”
Dempsey added.
Klein says Hagel has given her two years to carry out her
mission of determining the most-effective programs for improving the level of
professionalism within the military.
“Once we’re able to institutionalize these best practices
across the services, I’ve achieved success by working myself out of a job,” she
said.