By Jim Garamone DoD News, Defense Media Activity
ARLINGTON, Va., Feb. 28, 2018 — The special operations
enterprise must become more lethal, effective and efficient, the principal
deputy assistant secretary of defense for special operations and low intensity
conflict said today.
Mark E. Mitchell kicked off the National Defense Industrial
Association’s 29th annual SOLIC Symposium here, saying the community is at an
inflection point.
“I think [Defense] Secretary [James N.] Mattis has thrown
down the gauntlet in the National Defense Strategy, challenging not only the
department, but our industry partners to find technological solutions that
support [U.S. Special Operations Command’s] missions, including
counterproliferation and counternetwork,” he said.
Times have changed, Mitchell said. After spending the better
part of the last two decades concentrating on the counterinsurgency and
counterterrorism missions, he explained, there is a return of great power
confrontation. “The threat from terrorists is not going to go away, but we
think we’ve become pretty adept at limiting the threat from the terrorist
organizations,” he said.
Combating the terrorists will require constant attention,
but the special operations enterprise “is going to have to rediscover and
reinvent ourselves to deal with these near-peer competitors,” Mitchell said.
Advantage No Longer Assured
Mitchell, who entered the Army in 1987, said that during his
whole career the U.S. military always enjoyed dominance over any foe or
potential foe. “We’ve always enjoyed significant technological advantages over
the enemy,” he said. “But we can no longer assume that we will enjoy this
advantage, especially in the new competition with other great powers.”
This is not a return to the Cold War, he said, as Russia is
not the Soviet Union, China is not the China of the 1980s, and both nations are
much more integrated into the security architecture and economic systems, even
as they try to undermine them.
The National Defense Strategy notes that much of the
great-power competition will take place short of actual conflict, Mitchell
said. “We’ve seen how good our adversaries are at employing ambiguous, deniable
or even unwitting proxies to wage information warfare, cyberwarfare, industrial
espionage, sabotage and subversion,” he said.
DoD leaders want to ensure the U.S. military can fight and
win a high-intensity conflict, but the best solution is to compete at the level
of the adversaries and win there before actual combat occurs, he said. “This is
where the [special operations forces] enterprise can, and must, play a
significant role,” he added.
Technology Drives the Threat
The special operations community needs new technology, but
technology is also driving the threat, Mitchell said. Terror organizations,
transnational criminal networks, and even individuals can get technologies that
pose a threat to the United States, he pointed out, citing advanced computing,
the ability to crunch big data and artificial intelligence among technologies
available to them “at the retail level.” he said.
“We face an intelligent, adaptive and determined adversary
seeking to deploy these technologies in new ways,” he said. “We must be able to
do the same.”
The enemy uses social media. The U.S. military must be able
to respond “at the speed of relevance,” Mitchell said.
“The technological edge that we’ve enjoyed for three
decades, and which are essential for us to fight and win these wars, still
exists, but by no means are assured,” he said. “As Americans, freedom is our
birthright. But a perpetual technology advantage is not assured, and both must
be vigorously defended.”
No comments:
Post a Comment