By Army Sgt. 1st Class Tyrone C.
Marshall Jr.
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON – Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta has
clearly stated the consequences of sequestration, and the Pentagon has
delivered a responsible budget request with a sound strategy to the U.S.
Congress, Pentagon Press Secretary George Little told reporters today.
“No one, to my knowledge, has really
picked apart that strategy, including on Capitol Hill,” Little said. “People
seem to recognize that it’s a sound approach to dealing with what we need to do
to address the national security challenges of the future.”
Little said he understands there will be
disagreements between legislators and Pentagon officials over DOD’s proposed
budget, and how the security strategy will be implemented.
“We recognize that,” he said. “The DOD
budget is always fodder for issues that members of Congress may have. We
presented a budget; we’re engaging with the Congress to defend it.”
It’s understandable that Congress “may
want to make changes along the way -- that’s part of the legislative process”
in a democracy, Little said.
“But this is an unprecedented budget
build, as far as I can tell,” he added. “And we believe that we have what we
need in terms of a strong budget package to deal with a very strong strategy.”
Meanwhile, the Defense Department is
confronted with the possible implementation of sequestration, a mechanism
written into last year’s Budget Control Act that would trigger an additional
$500 billion across-the-board cut for defense spending over the next decade if
Congress doesn’t find an alternative by January.
The consequences of sequestration would
be “devastating” to the Defense Department, Little said.
Yet, “there’s not a whole lot of
planning [for sequestration], quite frankly, that you do, because it’s an
across-the-board cut,” the press secretary said. “I’ve heard it described as a
‘haircut’ by senior department officials. There’s not a whole lot of planning
we would have to do.”
The department would “take steps to deal
with the consequences of sequestration, and for perspective reductions in
resources, and personnel that sequestration may result in,” he added.
But at this point, Little said, steps to
deal with the consequences of sequestration “haven’t started yet.”
“We’re going to have to see where the
process takes us,” he said. “The focus is on trying to avoid sequestration. We
do expect, at some point, to have to deal with this if it starts to look us
straight in the face.”
Meanwhile, “we are affirmatively trying
to hold off sequestration,” Little said. “When you’re dealing with about a
half-billion dollars in cuts over 10 years, that is a daunting challenge, but
we think we’ve addressed it responsibly.”
No comments:
Post a Comment