By Cheryl Pellerin
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, Jan. 17, 2014 – At the Center for the Study of
Traumatic Stress, experts in the emotional toll of disasters help the Defense
Department, government agencies and first responders worldwide understand how
best to help communities struck by terrorist attacks, mass casualties and
natural disasters.
The center is part of the psychiatry department at the
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md. The USUHS
serves the Army, Navy, Air Force and U.S. Public Health Service by educating
health professionals for DOD and USPHS career service.
“The center was established essentially to address concerns
by the Department of Defense about psychological impacts and health
consequences that might result from the potential use of weapons of mass
destruction during combat [and] acts of terrorism or hostage events,” Dr.
Joshua C. Morganstein told American Forces Press Service during a recent
interview.
Morganstein, a commander in the Public Health Service, is an
assistant professor in the USUHS psychiatry department and a scientist at the
Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress.
“There was growing interest by DOD in the general
psychological impact and health consequences resulting from a broad category of
traumatic events,” he said, including peacekeeping missions, operations other
than war, and natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes and tsunamis.
DOD also was interested in more common stress-producing events like physical
assaults or boat, plane and car accidents for uniformed and civilian
communities, he said.
The center was established in 1987 as part of the USUHS
psychiatry department. Since its inception the center has been run by
department chairman Dr. Robert Ursano, who Morganstein said is internationally
renowned in the field of disaster psychiatry, which differs from general
psychiatry in important ways.
“Traditional psychiatry is, for the most part, hospital or
clinic based, taking place in a traditional treatment setting and generally one
on one … to focus on problems that an individual has sought care for,” Army
Col. (Dr.) David M. Benedek told American Forces Press Service.
Benedek is associate director for consultation and education
at the center, and professor and deputy chairman of the USUHS psychiatry
department.
“Disaster psychiatry is an effort to target the range of
possible responses to a disaster without people necessarily seeking care,” he
said, adding that the population-based approach in disaster psychiatry is to do
“things that help all people regardless of whether they have identified
themselves as having an illness” or as needing mental health care.
Benedek and Morganstein explained that a key element
underlying disaster response is a set of principles that together are known as
psychological first aid.
These five early intervention principles promote a sense of
safety by helping people meet basic needs for food and shelter, promote connectedness
by keeping families together, promote self-assurance by giving practical
suggestions that help people help themselves, promote hope by directing people
to government and other kinds of services, and promote calming by being
friendly and compassionate even if people are being difficult.
Examples of what not to do, according to the center’s fact
sheet, include not forcing people to share their stories, not giving simple
reassurances such as “Everything will be all right,” not making promises that
may not be kept, and not criticizing existing services or relief activities.
Psychological first aid, Morganstein said, “is designed to
encourage health-seeking and decrease the incidence of more severe psychiatric
symptoms or emotions and distress behaviors in the wake of a disaster.”
After the terrorist attacks on 9/11, the scientist added,
“people really sought Dr. Ursano out to address the impact of that event and
the nation’s need for disaster planning and preparedness for future events.”
In 2003, the center, whose multidisciplinary team had
expertise in disaster psychiatry, military medicine and psychiatry, social and
organizational psychology, neuroscience, family violence, workplace
preparedness and public education, established an Office of Public Education
and Preparedness.
“Before this,” Morganstein said, “Dr. Ursano and other
senior leaders here at the center played a role during disasters [like the 1986
Chernobyl nuclear accident in Ukraine, the 1988 Lockerbie, Scotland, Pan flight
103 jumbo jet crash, and the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States]. They
provided expertise, consultation and spoke with people about the best evidence
for managing psychiatric aspects of a disaster scenario.”
But the center needed a better way than individual
consultation to get its expert information out to more people affected by
disasters and to those involved in disaster response, he said.
An answer to this, and part of the new office’s multipronged
approach to education and outreach is producing and disseminating
rapid-response fact sheets tailored to ongoing situations such as last year’s
Navy Yard shootings.
“The fact sheets get information out there to [the DOD and
military mental health leadership], potential patients or affected public,
[health care providers] and other people who are in a position to provide
leadership and guidance,” Benedek said.
The goal, Morganstein added, “is to offer educational
resources to a wide range of folks who might potentially benefit from this
information in response to a disaster that’s happening.”
During the Navy Yard event, the center got a request from
the District of Columbia’s mental health department to consult with its
leaders, and from the mental health team lead from Walter Reed National
Military Medical Center that augmented Navy medicine’s SPRINT team response,
Morganstein said.
“One of the personnel from our center, a Public Health
officer, was asked to participate in the on-the-ground behavioral health
response,” he said. “Then we had about a 12-hour turnaround where, based on the
information as it rapidly evolved, we decided on what would be relevant issues
to the military, the D.C. government and first responders.”
Fact sheets were tailored to issues unique to an
active-shooter situation on a military installation in which many people were
killed, the shooter was killed, and challenges likely would arise as the D.C.
government and the Defense Department worked through managing a response to
people on the base and in the local community, he said.
The fact sheets were developed, reviewed by center
subject-matter experts and then disseminated to key leaders in DOD and the D.C.
government, the services’ mental health leadership, and organizations such as
the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association,
the USPHS leadership and others.
“That was the first 12 to 18 hours after the news broke of
the shooting as we watched it unfold,” Morganstein said.
The center’s consultive services and educational products
such as fact sheets, written in language everyone can understand, help to fill
a longstanding gap in medical education.
“Because disaster psychiatry is not something that over the
past several decades has gotten a lot of education,” Morganstein said, “it
isn’t built into the curricula of behavioral health or medical providers -- not
even in DOD, and certainly not in the civilian sector.”
Receiving such disaster-specific information can be a
paradigm shift for health providers, he added, “because what we’re saying to a
psychiatrist or a psychologist, for instance, is the therapy you spent years
learning to give and the medicines you spent years learning to prescribe may
not necessarily be the most important tool in your arsenal right now.”
Still, Benedek said, many training programs increasingly
recognize the need, in mental health and across medical disciplines, for
specific disaster training.
“Certainly, we’ve been advocating that in academic channels
and have published on the need for the development of an academic disaster
curriculum,” he said, adding that the USUHS psychiatry department offers a
disaster fellowship for one or two students a year.
The post-graduate training program is open to psychiatrists
and some internists who ultimately receive a master’s degree in public health
and then participate in rotations with agencies committed to disaster response.
“As far as we know, it’s the only disaster fellowship,”
Benedek added, “but other residency programs are developing at least some
training in this area for their psychiatric residents.”
In late March, for example, by joint invitation from
Sheppard Pratt Health System and the University of Maryland, Morganstein will
present a half-day seminar on disaster psychiatry for fourth-year residents
from both institutions.
“We’re interested in partnering more widely in this region
to begin with,” Morganstein said, “and potentially creating an educational
curriculum for psychiatry residents and expanding that potentially even
further.”
Agencies such as the Red Cross, the American Psychiatric
Association and the American Psychological Association disseminate disaster
information, Benedek said, but particularly in the last five or six years,
medical training programs have recognized the need to for curricula.
One such organization is the National Center for Disaster
Medicine and Public Health, established in 2008 by Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 21 as an academic center of excellence in disaster
medicine and public health.
The NCDMPH, also affiliated with USUHS, initially developed
a curriculum for responding to children's needs during disasters, Morganstein
said, then partnered with the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress to
develop a behavioral health curriculum toolkit called “Curriculum
Recommendations for Disaster Health Professionals: Disaster Behavioral Health,”
published this month.
Benedek said the new center, the fellowship at the Center
for the Study of Traumatic Stress, and increasing interest in disaster-focused
health curricula all are evidence that awareness of the need for such training
is growing nationwide.
“The lengthy conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have
certainly brought to the surface the reality of the emotional consequences of
traumatic exposures,” he said.
“Certainly, at military and governmental levels there’s an
awareness that bad events exact a psychological toll,” Benedek added, “and
there’s a need for a response to those events and training to develop an
appropriate and rational response across populations.”
No comments:
Post a Comment