By John Valceanu
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, July 18, 2012 – A Pentagon
audience yesterday learned about the impact and legacy of the War of 1812 on
the United States from a historian specializing in the conflict.
Christopher T. George, author of “Terror
on the Chesapeake: The War of 1812 on the Bay” and editor of the Journal of the
War of 1812, spoke about the war’s early stages to a packed room in the
Pentagon Conference Center. The event was part of a speaker series coordinated
by the Historical Office within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
More than 100 people, including military
service members from U.S. and allied nations, along with Defense Department
civilians and guests, listened as George delivered a lecture titled “The War of
1812: First Campaigns on Land and Sea.”
Speaking with a British accent resulting
from a childhood spent in England before emigrating to the U.S. as a boy,
George described the defeats suffered on land by American troops against their
British and Native American foes, as well as the stunning successes of U.S.
naval forces against the British navy, which was then the dominant naval force
in the world.
Though time limitations prevented him
from going into great detail, George sketched some of the more important events
and leaders of that conflict, including U.S. Brig. Gen. William Hull
surrendering Fort Detroit to British Maj. Gen. Sir Isaac Brock and Brock’s
later death during the Battle of Queenston Heights in what is now the province
of Ontario, Canada.
British Navy Adm. Sir George Cockburn,
whose troops burned Washington, D.C., and attacked Havre de Grace, Md., was
another figure about which the historian talked, as well as U.S. 2nd Lt. John
O’Neill, a hero of Havre de Grace who single-handedly manned what came to be
known as the “Potato Battery” against the ransacking British.
But George didn’t just discuss U.S. and
British military figures. He also talked about Tecumseh, a Native American
leader of the Shawnee, who fought alongside the British against the Americans
in the hope of creating an American Indian confederacy and stopping the
westward expansion of European Americans, and about President James Madison and
the impact his lack of military knowledge had on the war. In concluding his
presentation, the historian noted that the war was an important milestone in
the development of the United States.
“It was desperately hard work, but it
was part of the growing up process for the new American nation,” he said. “It
allowed American forces to stand toe to toe with a major nation, to gain a new
respect in the world, for Americans to think of themselves at last as a nation,
rather than a collection of states.”
Speaking with American Forces Press
Service after the lecture, George expounded on that theme. “Previously, the
nation saw itself as being just separate states in a federalized system, but
here they managed to have a national identity,” he said. “The U.S. Army and the
U.S. Navy had stood up to perhaps the preeminent military might in the world,
and they managed to hold their own against the British without French help,
which of course they had in the Revolution. So it was a whole new ball game, in
a way.”
During the interview, George said he
disagreed with those who use the term “the second war of American independence”
to describe the conflict, as he said the British were clearly not interested in
recapturing their colonies. “The major
British intent was to protect Canada,” he said. “By the end of the war, the
U.S. Army and Navy had proved themselves and although it wasn’t an American
victory overall, they had done themselves good credit.”
Though the war was essentially a
stalemate, George says he sees it as “a big part of America’s expansion across
the continent” and credits it with producing some important national symbols,
such as the USS Constitution’s nickname, “Old Ironsides,” the Star Spangled
Banner and the motto “Don’t give up the fight!”
“It’s sometimes said that the Americans
think they’ve won the War of 1812, the Canadians know they won the War of 1812
and the British have forgotten all about it,” he said. “There’s something for each
side to like about the war, some success that each of those three sides had.”
The biggest losers of the conflict,
George pointed out, were the Native Americans. The possibility of realizing the
dream of a nation of their own died along with Tecumseh and the dissolution of
his confederacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment