By Army Sgt. 1st Class Tyrone C. Marshall Jr.
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, April 3, 2014 – Air Force leaders testified
yesterday before the Senate Appropriations Committee on their service’s top
priorities now and for the future.
Joined by Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III
and National Guard leaders, Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James discussed the
challenges of operating in a tough fiscal climate.
“We are living in very challenging times,” she said, “both
in terms of our security environments as well as the budget environment that we
are facing. We have attempted to take these challenges on directly and
deliberately and thoughtfully, and we have done so as a team, very
inclusively.”
To make these choices, the secretary said, leaders used the
nation’s military strategy as their starting point.
“That begins with the strategy of today, which includes
defending the homeland against all threats, building security globally by
projecting U.S. influence, and deterring aggression,” James said, adding that
it also includes remaining prepared to win decisively should deterrence fail.
The Air Force must invest today in the technologies for
future platforms, the secretary said. “We need to also turn ourselves and
direct ourselves to new centers of power,” she added, “and be prepared to
operate in a more volatile and unpredictable world -- a world in which we can
no longer take for granted American dominance of the skies and space.”
James said the Air Force is crucial in both parts of this
strategy, but faces trouble with likely budget scenarios that would create
gaps.
“I’m certain that that will be the case,” she said. “Now,
having been an observer on the scene of defense for more than 30 years … there
are always some degree of gaps that we face between strategy and budget -- they
never match exactly.” When those mismatches occur, she said, judgment calls
must be made about what risks are most prudent.
This year has been more difficult and complex than most,
James said, with no “low-hanging fruit” to capture as part of budgetary
actions. And while the Bipartisan Budget Act and the Fiscal Year 2014
Appropriations Act provided “bump-ups,” the secretary noted, this didn’t solve
all of the Air Force’s issues.
The bottom line, James said, is that the budget and the
five-year plan need rebalancing.
“We are coming out of 13 years of a persistent war … and now
we need to rebalance,” she said. “We need to recapture our complete readiness
and our future capability.
“It’s really not an either/or situation,” she continued,
“because we very much need to have both in [those] rebalancing actions.”
James laid the framework for her three top priorities
through some of the major decisions the Air Force has made.
Those priorities, she said, are taking care of people,
balancing today’s readiness with tomorrow’s readiness, and ensuring the nation
has the best, most capable Air Force in the world at the best value for
taxpayers.
Delving into each priority, James explained each concept,
beginning with the recruiting and development of the best people.
“As far as I’m concerned, 100 percent of the time it always
comes down to people,” she said. “So taking care of people, to me, means we
need to recruit the right people, we need to retain the very best people.
“We need to shape the force as we go forward as well,” James
added, “and get the right balance between our active duty, our National Guard
and our reserve components.”
The Air Force’s plan going forward, she said, relies more
heavily on the National Guard and the Air Force Reserve.
James also said it is important to protect family programs
and to ensure a “climate of dignity and respect for all.”
“We have to continue to combat sexual assault and make sure
that everybody is living and leading our core values in the Air Force which are
integrity, service and excellence,” she said. Fair compensation also is
important, the secretary said, though slowed growth in compensation is
necessary.
On balancing today’s and tomorrow’s readiness, the secretary
said, the Air Force’s fiscal year 2015 budget request fully funds flying hours
and other high-priority readiness issues that, with time, will see gradual
improvement. The F-35 joint strike fighter, the KC-46 tanker and the new
long-range strike bomber all are protected as well with an eye on investing in
tomorrow’s readiness, she added.
Support to the nuclear triad also will continue, James said,
noting that two-thirds of the triad -- intercontinental ballistic missiles and
bombers -- come from the Air Force.
“We have also made decisions to replace our aging platforms
like the combat rescue helicopters,” James said, “and [to] invest in a new jet
engine technology that promises reduced fuel consumption, lower maintenance and
will help our industrial base.”
Given current budget realities, the secretary said, some
“very, very tough choices” had to be made.
“We proposed to retire some entire fleets,” James said.
“That way, we will get billions of dollars of savings, vice millions of
dollars. This will include the A-10 fleet and the U-2, which have served us
well for years. But again, tough choices were in order.”
The tough choices also include limiting combat air patrols
and retiring the Predator unmanned aerial vehicle fleet in favor of the “fully
capable MQ-9 Reaper fleet in the future,” she added.
James said her final priority is making sure every dollar
counts.
“This means keeping acquisition programs on budget and on
schedule,” she said. “We’re going to continue to move forward and get to a
point where we [have] auditability as a Department of Defense and as an Air
Force. We’re going to trim overhead, including that 20 percent reduction you’ve
heard [Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel] talk about.”
James said if sequestration-level funding returns in fiscal
2016, Air Force leaders believe it would compromise national security too much.
If forced to return to those previous levels, James said, 80 more aircraft,
including the KC-10 tanker fleet, would have to be retired, sensor upgrades to
the Global Hawk would be deferred, and the purchases of F-35s would slow.
The Air Force also would have fewer combat air patrols, fewer
Predator-Reaper patrols, and would be unable to continue the next-generation
jet engine program. Other important programs would have to be re-evaluated, she
said.
Welsh also testified on the impacts of a return to
sequester-level funding, telling the panel that Air Force leaders simply cannot
ignore the fact that the law as currently written returns sequestered funding
levels in fiscal 2016.
“And to prepare for that,” Welsh said, “we must cut people
and force structure now to create a balanced Air Force that we can afford to
train and operate in [fiscal 2016] and beyond. We also have to look at where we
must recapitalize to be viable against a threat 10 years from now.”
Welsh said while there are no “easy choices left” regarding
the budget, the Air Force is the “finest in the world,” and everything needs to
be done to keep it as such.
“We built this budget to ensure that Air Force combat power
remains unequaled,” he said. “But that does not mean that it will remain
unaffected.”
No comments:
Post a Comment