By Nick Simeone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity
WASHINGTON, Feb. 25, 2015 – U.S. and European sanctions
imposed on Russia for its support of Ukrainian separatists and the annexation
of Crimea are having a significant impact on Russia’s economy but have not
curtailed Moscow’s continued intervention in the region, two senior Defense
Department officials told Congress today.
“We are hearing, for example, more dissatisfaction of the
oligarchs, who to date have been very supportive of [Russian President
Vladimir] Putin,” Christine E. Wormuth, undersecretary of defense for policy,
told the House Armed Services Committee during a hearing on security threats to
Europe that focused largely on Russia’s threat to Ukraine and Eastern Europe.
Regarding the sanctions, the Russian oligarchs “are
concerned about the impact it is having on their businesses, on their own
financial holdings, but it has not changed so far what Russia has been doing on
the ground, and that is the great concern,” Wormuth said during her testimony.
She added, “That is where there is the need again to look at
the overall package of cost-imposing strategies toward Russia and also support
to Ukraine to see if we can change the calculus.”
Assistance for Ukraine
In addition to ongoing military exercises and a stepped-up
NATO presence in Eastern Europe, the Obama administration has committed $118
million in nonlethal aid and training to the Ukrainian government in Kiev and a
similar amount for fiscal year 2015.
Ukraine’s government, which has lost control of significant
portions of the eastern part of the country to Russian-backed rebels since
fighting began a year ago, has asked allies -- including the United States --
for lethal aid.
“There is various discussion of providing defensive lethal
assistance in an effort to again raise costs on Russia, not from the
perspective at all of being able to fundamentally alter the military balance …
but to try to give Ukraine more ability to defend itself against the separatist
aggression,” Wormuth said in answer to legislators’ questions. In fact, Wormuth
and Air Force Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, Supreme Allied Commander Europe and
commander of U.S. European Command, both told lawmakers they did not know how
Putin would respond if the West began supplying lethal aid to the government in
Kiev. However, “what we’re doing now is not changing the results on the
ground,” Breedlove said.
More Economic Pressure
Wormuth said pressure should continue on all fronts and that
stepped-up economic and financial isolation of Russia could prove more
effective than providing lethal aid to the Ukrainian government, a move that
she said could lead Russia to “double down” on its support for Ukrainian
separatists and thereby escalate the conflict.
Ultimately, Breedlove said, he does not think the Ukrainian
military is capable of stopping further Russian advances and that the best
resolution to the year-old conflict remains a diplomatic one. Even so, neither
he nor Wormuth expressed confidence that a cease-fire agreement reached earlier
this month in Belarus -- the second such agreement in five months -- would
hold.
“Mr. Putin has not accomplished his objectives yet in
Ukraine, so next is probably more action,” Breedlove said. He suggested Moscow
knows what lines are not worth crossing, testifying that while “pressure is
being brought [by Russia] on nations to keep them from leaning West,” Breedlove
felt the Russian president is well aware of NATO’s obligation to come to the
defense of any member threatened with attack.
“I do believe that Mr. Putin understands Article 5, but I do
not believe that that would preclude Mr. Putin from taking some actions in
reaching out to the disparate Russian-speaking populations that are in some
[of] our easternmost nations in NATO,” Breedlove said, referring primarily to
the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.
Turning to another security concern, both defense officials
described instability in the Middle East, in particular the control that the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant has over territory just to the south of
Europe.
“The flow of returning foreign terrorist fighters to Europe
and the United States in both the near- and mid-term poses a significant risk,
including to our forward-based forces in Europe,” Breedlove said, and “is
likely to grow more complex for the next decade or longer.”
No comments:
Post a Comment