By Amaani Lyle
American Forces Press Service
MONTEREY, Calif. – As the Defense
Department adopts a new paradigm for the U.S. military to remain a formidable
force while absorbing $487 billion in spending reductions over the next decade,
the prospect of an additional $500 billion spending reduction over that period
would be “a disaster” not only for national defense, but also for defense
communities, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said here today.
In remarks at an Association of Defense
Communities conference, the secretary said the new defense strategy and the
Pentagon’s budget decisions reflect the need to bring the government’s budget
under control.
“There is a strategic and fiscal imperative
that is driving the department to a smaller, … leaner and more agile force –
that’s the reality,” Panetta said. “It would be irresponsible not to reduce the
budget and do our role in confronting the fiscal challenges facing this
country.”
The secretary noted that though the
department and the nation are weathering a period of great challenge, an
opportunity for planning emerges.
Under the new strategy, Panetta said,
the force will remain agile, quickly deployable, flexible, and prepared to deal
with crises anywhere in the world. As drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan unfold,
the United States will continue to sharpen its focus on matters in the
Asia-Pacific region, sparking a rebalance of global posture as part of an
overall strategy to maintain a presence elsewhere in the world.
Additionally, he said, vigilance against
cyberspace threats is essential. He called the cyber arena the “battlefield for
the future,” with the potential to cripple progress for the United States and
its allies.
The strategy also must include
investment in and protection of DOD’s industrial base, the secretary said.
Close partnerships with members of
Congress, committees, caucuses, defense industrial partners, foreign allies,
foreign partners and defense communities across the country remain one of the
guiding principles in implementing the new strategy, Panetta said.
Noting that he has to “put every area of
the defense budget on the table,” the secretary acknowledged challenges that
stem from assessing major areas such as compensation, which he said has
increased by 80 percent.
“Unless we confront the costs in that
area, we’re going to find ourselves cutting our national defense in order to
deal with tremendously increased health care costs.” But at the same time, he
said, the Defense Department must “keep faith” with the military.
“We’ve got to make sure we stand by the
promises that were made to them and to their families,” Panetta said, adding
defense communities can help by making sure they hire veterans and spouses who
enrich those areas. “I ask each of you to look for creative ways to help us
better support each other,” he said. “We’ve got be honest and open with each
about the nature of the fiscal challenge that confronts this country.”
But a “sequestration” mechanism built
into the budget law would trigger another half-trillion dollars in
across-the-board defense spending cuts over the next decade, Panetta said, and
a similar amount in other government spending if Congress fails to find an
alternative by January. That, he said, would “hollow out the military.”
“I've made clear, and I'll continue to
do so, that if sequestration is allowed to go into effect, it'll be a disaster
for national defense and it would be a disaster, frankly, for defense
communities as well,” he said. “And frankly, it's not only true about the DOD
budget, it's also true relating to the domestic discretionary cuts that will
deprive communities of the needed federal support they need in areas like
education.”
Panetta called sequestration “an
indiscriminate formula” that was never meant to take effect.
“It was never designed to be
implemented,” he said. “It was designed to trigger such untold damage that it
would force people to do the right thing.” He urged the defense community
leaders to do what they can to ensure Congress reaches a solution that avoids
sequestration.
No comments:
Post a Comment