By Karen Parrish
American Forces Press Service
ABOARD A MILITARY AIRCRAFT, July 27, 2012 - Heading back to Washington
yesterday after a 10-day Asia-Pacific tour, Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton B.
Carter said he had succeeded in informing allies and partners about specific
aspects of the U.S. strategic rebalance, and had, in turn, received strategic
and practical information about what the shift means to other nations.
"I think that what our partners and allies in this region are looking
for is confirmation that the United States is serious and concrete about
shifting ... a great deal of our emphasis from the places we have been -- of
necessity -- preoccupied for the last decade, namely Iraq and Afghanistan, to
the Asia-Pacific region," Carter noted.
He told American Forces Press Service that during his travels, he gave
allies a level of planning detail and a number of examples relating to specific
U.S. strategic rebalancing events that helped them understand "that we
are, as I said at the beginning of the trip, walking the walk and not just
talking the talk."
During his travels since July 17, the deputy secretary has told high-level
ministers in Japan, Thailand, India and South Korea, as well as senior military
officials in Hawaii and civilian and uniformed leaders in Guam, that the United
States will increase its regional naval presence over time, invest in
technologies relevant to the region's needs, and increase forward-deployed
presence or troop rotations in several key areas of the theater, from Australia
to Guam to Singapore.
Partnered training and exercises will also deepen U.S. strategic engagement
in the Asia-Pacific region, he added. Carter said there are two reasons he's
confident DOD can carry out the strategy even with a constrained defense
budget.
First, he said, a lot of excess capacity has been freed up from Iraq and
more will become available as resource commitments in Afghanistan ease.
Pentagon leaders can re-invest that capital to build U.S. military posture in
the Asia-Pacific region, the deputy secretary said.
"The second reason is that we are prioritizing capabilities that are
particularly relevant to this region in our budget," the deputy secretary
continued. "Even though we don't have all the money we want, we have all
the money we need for the Asia-Pacific ... re-posturing."
Carter said he received valuable input from government ministers across the
Asia-Pacific region and from U.S. military commanders.
"I got a lot of useful thinking -- strategic and practical -- about how
we can carry the rebalance to the next level. Because this isn't a one-year
thing; this isn't just a fiscal [2013] issue," he said. "We have to
keep going. This is a transition that our department will undergo for several
years."
"From our commanders out there, who are on the scene every day -- all
of whom are superb -- I got lots of good ideas," Carter added.
The deputy secretary said the U.S. commanders he spoke with also discussed
their operations and plans, including multinational exercises with partner and
allied forces.
"[The commanders] are wonderful executors of the strategy, and also
wonderful ambassadors for our department," Carter said. "All of them
are spectacular."
Allied and partner senior officials he has spoken with this month offered
suggestions to improve U.S. military-to-military or government-to-government
cooperation, the deputy secretary said.
"For example, in India, which was very important ... I discussed with
all of the senior leadership in the Indian government ways that we can
strengthen our cooperation and deepen it technologically," he said, noting
the Indians don't want to just buy American weapons systems.
"They have a proud technological heritage," Carter said of the
Indians. "and they want a relationship that enriches that, and enables
that -- not just a buyer-seller relationship."
Such technology-sharing partnerships are long-established with Japan, South
Korea and Thailand, the deputy secretary noted. "We've had longer
partnerships with them," he added. "So much more is established, but
much more remains to be done. So I discussed with the ministers of defense and
other leaders in Japan, the Republic of Korea and Thailand ways that we can
step up our cooperation with them in a way that reflects the rebalancing."
As part of an overall force posture adjustment in the Asia-Pacific, DOD
plans to relocate some U.S. troops based in both Japan and South Korea over the
next several years. DOD officials have described those moves as intended, in
part, to ease pressure on populations in congested urban areas. These kinds of
responses to partner nation conditions are part of what the new strategy aims
for, Carter said.
"I would say that our partners out here are overwhelmingly welcoming of
our attention to them, and effort on [their] behalf," he said. "I emphasized,
as I always do, that our perspective is regional and global. It's to keep a
good thing going in the Asia-Pacific region."
For 70 years the region has enjoyed peace and stability "for
everyone," Carter noted.
"I say 'everyone' because people always ask me about China, and I
always say the rebalancing is not about China," he said. "It's not
about the United States. It's not about any one country; it's about regional
security. It's that environment of security that has led to 40 years now, in
Asia, of remarkable progression in lifting people from poverty: first Japan,
then South Korea, then Southeast Asia, now China and India."
"It's a great story of human progress, and it doesn't come
automatically," Carter continued. "There has to be security for progress,
[and] we have been an important part of providing that for decades. And we
intend to do that for decades in the future."
The deputy secretary acknowledged that in some ways the rebalancing strategy
is a "back to the future" approach to the region.
"We have been playing this role in the Asia-Pacific theater for many
decades," Carter said. "And all we're saying is that we intend to
continue to play it.That needs to be emphasized, because many people in the
region and also in our own country have been preoccupied, very understandably,
with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan."
"And they may have lost sight of the fact
that an anchoring commitment of global security is here in the Asia-Pacific
region," he added, "and we are that anchor."